翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ RFUEA Ground ・ RFUGrey ・ RFV ・ RFW ・ RFWD2 ・ RFX Interactive ・ RFX1 ・ RFX2 ・ RFX3 ・ RFX4 ・ RFX5 ・ RFX6 ・ RFXANK ・ RFXAP ・ RG ・ RG Anand v. Deluxe Films ・ RG Capital ・ Rg chromaticity ・ RG color space ・ RG Heidelberg ・ RG Jones Sound Engineering ・ RG Line ・ RG Outrider ・ RG postcode area ・ RG Premium ・ RG Snyman ・ RG Veda ・ RG-12 ・ RG-19 ・ RG-31 Nyala Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク RG Anand v. Deluxe Films ： ウィキペディア英語版 RG Anand v. Deluxe Films ''RG Anand v. Delux Films,'' (AIR 1978 SC 1613) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in the area of copyright law. The case deals with a copyright infringement suit against the movie ''New Delhi'' made by (Mohan Sehgal ) in 1954. The plaintiff R.G. Anand, contended that it was modeled on the plot of a play ''Ham Hindustani'' written and produced by him. The judgment is remarkable for clarifying the concepts of idea-expression dichotomy and copyright infringement under the Indian copyright law. == Background of the case == The plaintiff wrote the play ''Ham Hindustani'' and it soon became very popular. In 1954, the defendant Mohan Sehgal sent a letter to the plaintiff that he wishes to make a movie based on the play. The plaintiff met the defendant and discussed the entire play. The defendant did not commit anything, but the plaintiff later came to know that the defendant released a movie titled ''New Delhi''. After watching the movie, the plaintiff was of the opinion that it is based on the story of his play. So he filed a suit against the defendant for permanent injunction and damages. Both the District Court and the High Court ruled against the plaintiff on a finding of the facts. The case finally reached the Supreme Court of India. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「RG Anand v. Deluxe Films」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.